What should you do if the IRS is auditing you?

Read the transcript

IRS audits don't usually go wrong because someone was trying to cheat. They go wrong because people respond the wrong way. The wrong time for the wrong reasons. Most taxpayers think an audit is just about paperwork. Receipts. Forms. Numbers. Documents. But in reality, an IRS audit is about positioning. By the time the IRS starts asking questions, they're already testing whether your story makes sense and how you respond early on determine whether the audit stays narrow or quietly turns into something far more expensive.

In this video, I want to walk you through the most common IRS audit mistakes that I see, why they cost people thousands of dollars, and what you should be doing differently if you want to stay in control of the process instead of reacting to it. Mistake number one treating an IRS audit like a casual conversation. One of the biggest mistakes people make is assuming the IRS auditor is just looking things over, so they start explaining.

They talk too much. They answer questions that weren't actually asked. An IRS audit is not a conversation. It's a structured process. And every word you give the IRS becomes part of the record. Auditors are trained to listen for inconsistencies. If your explanation wanders, evolves, or induces new facts, you're expanding the audit yourself. The safest response is always precise, limited, and supported by documentation, nothing more. Mistake number two oversharing because you think cooperation equals safety.

People believe that being overly cooperative with the IRS will make the audit easier, so they volunteer timelines, they give background stories, they explain motivations. That instinct is understandable, but it's dangerous. The IRS doesn't need context unless it's legally relevant. When you overshare, you give the auditor new angles to explore. Audits don't expand because the IRS is suspicious, necessarily. They expand because taxpayers or their documents give them reasons to expand the audit.

Mistake number three believing missing receipts automatically means you lose. This is one of the most damaging assumptions that taxpayers make. If they don't have perfect documentation, they assume the IRS wins by default, and that's simply not true. The IRS allows reconstruction of records. In fact, reconstruction is normal. Nobody calls my office with pristine records going back years. You can rebuild expenses using bank statements, vendor histories, invoices, mileage logs, job locations, industry norms.

What matters isn't perfection. It's whether the reconstruction is logical, consistent, and reasonable. The real mistake is missing paperwork. It's failing to present a defensible alternative. Mistake number four accepting the first auditor's conclusions as final. Many people don't realize this, but an audit report is not a verdict. The first auditor is not the final authority. Their job is to review what's in front of them and issue a report based on that snapshot.

Appeals exist for a reason. Appeals officers are more experienced, they're more focused on resolution, and they're often form more reasonable than front line auditors. I've seen countless cases where taxpayers accepted assessments simply because they didn't know they could push back, or were too exhausted to fight. Assuming that this is just how it is, it's one of the most expensive mistakes you can make. Mistake number five rushing to close the audit just to make it stop.

Auditors stressful. People want relief so they agree to adjustments. They don't fully understand. They sign reports they haven't reviewed carefully. They waive appeal rights just to move on. That short term relief almost always creates long term damage. Once an assessment is finalized, penalties and interest begin compounding and collections become the next phase. Speed helps the IRS, but deliberation protects you. Mistake number six not understanding what the IRS is actually looking for.

Most audits aren't about fraud. They're about whether your numbers make sense together. The IRS looks for patterns, income that doesn't match lifestyle expenses that look estimated deductions outside industry norms. Losses that repeat year after year. Your tax return as a story. And if the story you return tells isn't believable, the IRS will start pulling threads. That's why I just organize. Books are dangerous. Not because they're illegal, but because they're hard to defend.

Mistake number seven. Letting fear dictate strategy. Fear causes people to talk too much. Agree too quickly. Avoid asking questions and give up leverage. The IRS is not offended by structure. They expect documentation. They expect clarification. They even expect to disagreement as long as it's done correctly. Freezing up doesn't help your case. Oversharing doesn't help your case. Rushing doesn't help your case. Audits are not about proving innocence.

They're about whether your position is defensible. And the IRS will always take the path of least resistance. Why? These mistakes feel reasonable in the moment. This is the hardest part. Most audit mistakes feel reasonable at the time. People assume the IRS already knows everything. Pushing back will make it worse. And I just want this over with. But those instincts work against you. Tone beats compliance structure beats speed, and strategy beats fear.

What smart audit responses actually look like? A smart auto response focuses on limiting scope, answering only what's ask. Supporting positions with documentation. Reconstructing records when necessary. Preserving appeal rights. It's not about being aggressive. It's about being intentional. If any of these mistakes sound familiar, don't panic. Just get informed. I put together a free resource called the IRS Freeze Guide. explains what to do if you're frozen with fear and just don't know what to do, why it happens, and how to file yourself out so you can take action and start to resolve your IRS problems for good.

You can download it for free using the link below. One more mistake that deserves its own mention. The final mistake I see is waiting until enforcement begins before taking things seriously. Once liens, levies, or garnishments are on the table, your leverage is gone. At that point, you're not planning anymore. You're reacting. The earlier you engage, the more options you have. Waiting doesn't buy time. It costs it.

The IRS audits aren't fatal. But responding to them the wrong way can quietly turn a manageable situation into a very expensive one. The better move is understanding what actually triggers audits in the first place, because avoiding them is always easier than fixing them after the fact. That's why you should watch my next video, where I break down the top IRS audit triggers. And what puts returns on the IRS enforcement radar?

See you there.

Getting a letter from the IRS that says the word audit is scary. Take a breath. Most audits are far narrower than the horror stories you have heard, and most of them are survivable with good records and a cool head.

Here's the truth: the IRS usually is not putting your whole financial life on trial. They are asking about specific items on a specific return. Your job is to answer those specific questions with documentation, and nothing more.

After 30-plus years of standing between people and the IRS, I can tell you the outcome often comes down to two things: how organized you are, and how disciplined you are about what you say.

The three types of IRS audits

There are three kinds of audits, and knowing which one you have tells you how serious it is. A correspondence audit is handled entirely by mail. It is the most common and the narrowest. The IRS wants proof of one or two items, you mail copies of your documents, and often that is the end of it.

An office audit means you are asked to bring records to a local IRS office and meet with an examiner. It is a step up in scope, but still usually focused on particular line items.

A field audit is the most serious. An IRS agent comes to your home, your business, or your representative's office and reviews things in person. Field audits tend to be broader and involve larger dollar amounts. If you have one of these, get help before you say a word.

The golden rules of surviving an audit

Don't panic. An audit is a process, not a verdict. Panic makes people talk too much and hand over things nobody asked for.

Answer only the question that was asked. This is the single most important habit in any audit. Every extra answer you volunteer can open a brand-new door the examiner did not even know was there. The less you say, the tighter the audit stays. Say less.

Stay organized and be truthful. Bring exactly what was requested, neatly labeled, and nothing else. Never lie to the IRS, and never guess out loud. If you do not know an answer, the correct response is that you will get back to them. Keep the scope of the audit as narrow as it started.

You have the right to representation

Here is something a lot of people do not realize: you generally do not have to sit across the table from the IRS yourself. You have the right to be represented by an attorney, CPA, or enrolled agent, and that person can attend the audit in your place.

That matters for more than comfort. A representative knows what the examiner is really after, keeps the conversation on the documents, and stops you from volunteering the offhand comment that turns a small audit into a big one. When your emotions are not in the room, the audit tends to stay smaller and calmer.

If you disagree, the auditor is not the final word

Audits do not always end the way you want, and that is not the end of the road. The examiner who ran your audit is not the last word. If you disagree with the proposed changes, you have the right to take your case to IRS Appeals, an independent office whose whole job is to look at disputes with fresh eyes.

This is why documentation wins audits. Good records let you push back with proof instead of argument. The taxpayers who keep clean, organized paper almost always fare better than the ones relying on memory and good intentions.

Bottom line: If the IRS is auditing you, don't panic, stay organized, answer only what is asked, remember you can be represented and can appeal, because good documentation and disciplined answers are what win audits.

Frequently asked questions

Does an audit mean I am in trouble or being accused of a crime?

No. Most audits are routine document reviews of specific items on a return, not criminal accusations. The IRS is asking you to support what you reported. If you have records to back up your numbers, an audit is usually a manageable process rather than a disaster.

What is the difference between correspondence, office, and field audits?

A correspondence audit is done by mail and is the most common and narrowest. An office audit asks you to bring records to a local IRS office. A field audit, where an agent comes to you or your business, is the broadest and most serious. The type of audit tells you how much is at stake.

Should I just explain everything to the auditor to clear things up?

No. Answer only the questions actually asked and provide only the documents requested. Volunteering extra information can open new issues the examiner was not even looking at. Being cooperative does not mean being an open book. Stay truthful, stay brief, and keep the scope tight.

Do I have to attend the audit myself?

Generally, no. You have the right to be represented by an attorney, CPA, or enrolled agent, and that person can attend in your place. Having a representative keeps the audit focused on the documents and helps you avoid saying something that unintentionally widens the inquiry.

What can I do if I disagree with the audit result?

The examiner is not the final word. If you disagree with the proposed changes, you can take your case to IRS Appeals, an independent office that reviews disputes separately from the auditor. Strong documentation is what gives you leverage to challenge a result you believe is wrong.

Related Videos

IRS Letter 979: What "Your Records Were Not Adequate" Really Means

5:22

Read the transcript

Editor's note: Darrin T. Mish was admitted to The Florida Bar in October 1993 and founded his firm in 1996. Any length of practice mentioned in this video reflects when it was recorded (published June 15, 2026).

You open an envelope from the IRS and it says your records weren't adequate. This is IRS letter 979. Your stomach dropped. You're picturing agents at the door and your bank account drained by Friday. Take a breath. After 32 years of doing this, I can tell you that letter 979 is not the monster that it looks like, but it is a warning shot and how you answer it definitely matters.

Here's the part most people miss. Letter 979 is not a bill. It's not a levy. Nobody is seizing anything. It shows up after an audit. The examiner looked at your business return, asked for the records behind your numbers, and decided that what you handed over wasn't enough to prove your income or your deductions, so they couldn't verify the return from your paperwork. The letter does two things.

It tells you that your recordkeeping fell short, and it tells you how to fix it and asks you to put it in writing, how you fixed it. That's the whole letter. They're putting you on notice, not putting you out of business. So, why you? Usually, it's not fraud and it's not some red flag that you tripped on purpose. Is that your books didn't hold up under a flashlight.

Maybe you ran income through a personal account and a business account and nobody could tell which was which. Maybe your deductions were real, but the receipts were gone. Maybe everything lived in a shoe box and a memory. Here's the truth. The IRS doesn't need you to be perfect. They need you to be able to prove what you put on that return. When you can't, that gap is what triggers letter 979.

Now, let's talk about what they're entitled to expect because this isn't the IRS making up rules as they go. The tax code requires every business to keep records good enough to show its income and back up its deductions. That means your income records that match your deposits, expense records with receipts and invoice tied to actual transactions, mileage logs, payroll records, a real set of books, not a gas at your end.

When the examiner says inadequate, that's the standard you missed. Not artistry, not a CPA's gold star, just records that prove your numbers. Now, some of you have heard that there's a rule that lets you estimate when your records are gone. There is. It's called the Cohen rule, and it comes out of a case from 1930 involving a Broadway producer who kept terrible books. Now, here's the part that the internet won't tell you.

Don't count on it. The Cohen rule only helps you if you can first prove that you actually spent the money. And even then, the court hands you the smallest number it can justify. Worse, it doesn't apply at all to expenses people lean on the most. Travel, meals, entertainment, business gifts, and listed property like your vehicle, your computer, your cell phone. For those, the law demands strict substantiation.

No receipts, no deductions. Estimates won't save you. So, if your plan for letter 979 is I'll just estimate it later, that plan has a hole in it. And here's where people actually get hurt not from 979 itself, but from ignoring it. If you sit on this letter and do nothing, the next thing in your mailbox is letter 10:22. That's the followup and it's not patient. It gives you 15 days to explain how you've corrected your bookkeeping.

Blow past that deadline and the tone changes. Now you're looking at more audits, adjusted liability on the return they couldn't verify, and penalty stacking on top. There's an accuracy penalty for negl negligence that runs 20% of the understatement of tax plus interest that doesn't stop. A paperwork problem becomes a money problem, and it didn't have to. So, let's talk about doing it right. When you respond, you don't just say, "I'll do better." Anybody can say that, and the IRS has heard it 10,000 times.

You show them a system. That means real accounting software with a proper chart of accounts, a clean separation between business and personal money, receipts matched to transactions, a bookkeeping process you actually follow monthly, not a frantic reconstruction at year end. If you brought in a bookkeeper or a new firm, you just say so. The message you want the examiner to walk away with is simple. The gap that triggered the letter is closed and it's not coming back.

You put that in writing. You back it up and you do it before the deadline. in writing matters. A phone call you can't prove later is worth nothing. Let me save you some pain with the mistakes I see the most. One, ignoring it because it doesn't demand money. The clock is running whether you read the letter or not. Two, getting defensive and arguing the audit instead of answering the actual question, which is about your records going forward.

And three, going it alone when the underlying audit is still a lie. The wrong answer here can reopen your books and invite them right back in. Now, the good news, and there is real good news. By itself, letter 979 doesn't cost you a dime. It's a chance to get clean before any of this gets expensive. Fix the records, document the fix, answer in writing before the deadline, do those three things, and those letter goes away quietly, the way most of them do when somebody actually responds.

The reality is almost always more manageable than the nightmare in your head. If you got letter 979 and you're not sure that your response will hold up, don't guess. The wrong move here is the one that turns a warning into a bill. Let's talk. We'll tell you exactly what they want to see and we'll make sure your answer closes the door instead of opening

IRS CP2000 Notice: What It Means and What to Do (Don't Just Pay It)

2:55

Read the transcript

You open the mail and there it is, a letter from the IRS with CP2000 printed at the top. It says you owe more money, sometimes a lot more, and your stomach drops. Now, take a breath. A CP2000 is not an audit. It's not a bill. And it's not the IRS accusing you of cheating. Here's what it actually is, and here's exactly what to do about it. A CP2000 comes from a computer, not an agent.

The IRS matches what you put on your return against what other people reported about you. your W2s, your 1099s, your brokerage statements, all of it gets filed with the IRS's. When the numbers don't add up, the computer flags it and spits out a proposed change. That's the key word, proposed. The IRS is telling you what it thinks the number should be. It's not the final word. And here's the part that most people miss.

The IRS is often wrong or at least incomplete. The classic example is stock sales. Your brokerage reports that you sold $10,000 of stock. The IRS computer sees $10,000 of income. What it doesn't see is that you paid $9,000 for that stock in the first place and your real gain was just $1,000. But the CP2000 wants to tax you on the whole $10,000. Multiply that across a few transactions and the proposed balance looks terrifying and it's also usually inflated.

So, what do you do? First, don't ignore it. That's the one move that turns a manageable problem into a real one. A CP2000 gives you a deadline, usually 30 days to respond. There's a response worm right in the notice. You can agree, you can partially agree, or you can disagree. If they're right, you sign, you arrange to pay, and you move on. If they're wrong, and they often are, you respond in writing, and you attach the proof, the cost basis of that stock, the 1099 that got reported twice, the income that was already on your return, just under a different line.

You make the IRS show its work, and you show yours. What happens if you do nothing? Well, the proposed change becomes a real assessment. The CP2000 turns into a notice of deficiency, the dreaded 90-day letter, and after that, the IRS can assess the tax and start collecting leans, levies, the whole machine, all because of a piece of mail that sat on the counter. Now, here's the truth.

After 32 years of doing this, most CP2000 notices aren't the disaster they feel like on day one. A lot of them get reduced. Some get wiped out completely, but only if you respond and respond correctly before the clock runs out. Knowledge is protection. You now know what this notice is, what it's not, and what it's asking of you. If you have a CP2000 sitting in front of you, and the numbers don't make sense, don't guess and don't panic.

Let's talk. We'll tell you straight whether you owe it, and if you don't, how to prove it. Thanks for watching.

Talk to a tax attorney

Every IRS case is different. If you want a straight answer about your situation, Darrin Mish has spent more than three decades getting people out from under the IRS. The first conversation is free and confidential.

Schedule a free consultation (813) 229-7100

This page is general information, not legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. IRS rules change and every situation is different. Talk to a qualified tax professional about your specific facts.