part4-179

4.23.3 
Classification, Selection and Assignment of Employment Tax Cases

4.23.3.1 
(03-24-2009)
Overview

  1. This section provides the guidelines for the classification, selection, and assignment of employment tax returns for examination.

  2. Employment tax returns do not contain information that would provide a basis for classifying returns for examination potential.
    Selection of returns is based on known or probable areas of non-compliance. Therefore, alternative classification techniques
    and criteria are used to identify those issues or returns that have the greatest potential.

  3. The Employment Tax Examination Program is a lead driven program. Examinations can originate from a variety of sources, some
    of which are listed in this section.

4.23.3.2 
(03-24-2009)
Identifying SB/SE Employment Tax Examinations

  1. SB/SE Employment Tax Headquarters has primary responsibility for workload selection and delivery. However, field examiners
    must be continuously aware of new developments, rulings and decisions affecting industries within their jurisdictions. Field
    exam is responsible for forwarding suggestions for Preparer Projects, Compliance Initiative Projects (CIPs) and partnering
    opportunities.

  2. There are various sources that help us to detect those taxpayers who are not complying with the employment tax laws. These
    sources include:

    1. Internal Revenue Service employees who are in constant contact with taxpayers and are aware of possible non-compliance. (Employment
      tax managers and examiners should solicit referrals from Collection, Taxpayer Assistance Centers, Criminal Investigation,
      Examination, ACS call sites, and Campuses.),

    2. Other federal and state government agencies. (Social Security Administration, Department of Labor, State Departments of Unemployment,
      etc.),

    3. Locally developed lead sources, market segment studies and compliance initiatives.

  3. Strong emphasis is placed on the required filing check program. Thus, during an examination of an income tax, excise tax,
    or exempt organization return, the examiner will inspect retained copies of employment tax returns (verify filing through
    IDRS where appropriate) and, based on available information, will decide if an examination of employment tax returns is warranted.
    If warranted, the employment tax examination will be made concurrently.

  4. Related return information must be considered when determining examination potential for employment tax returns. This will
    include a review of the related income tax returns and in the case of large corporations or publicly traded companies, a complete
    review of their financial statements will be necessary. Information may also be gained from news articles, company publications,
    and internet searches, such as Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filings and company web-sites.

  5. All income tax cases selected for examination under the LMSB Program should include consideration of employment tax potential.
    Referrals are mandatory on all coordinated industry cases (CIC) and on all industry cases (IC) at activity code 223 and above.
    Where employment tax issues or returns are identified as warranting examination, an employment tax specialist will prepare
    the employment tax portion of the examination plan.

  6. The request for a specialist is made using the Specialist Referral System located at https://srs.web.irs.gov/Default.asp.
    This system can be used by any employee, regardless of operating division. In addition to requesting referrals, the system
    may be used to submit informal questions or link to a particular specialist’s home page.

  7. The assistance of employment tax specialists may be sought by the Employee Plans/Exempt Organizations Division, whether or
    not the team audit concept is being employed in the particular case.

  8. The employment tax program may receive referrals from Criminal Investigation. These lead cases should be worked with continual
    awareness of fraud potential. If indications of fraud are developed in the course of case lead development or during the examination,
    the case should be submitted to the Criminal Investigation Division for consideration.

4.23.3.3 
(03-24-2009)
Planning and Selection Criteria for SB/SE

  1. In SB/SE, classification and selection of employment tax returns for examination is the responsibility of the Centralized
    Workload Selection and Delivery (CWSD) operation. Classification and selection will be accomplished by Campus classification
    personnel supplemented by classification details using field staff.

  2. Examiners generally classify cases that have been identified as part of a project or identified workstream. In most projects,
    the cases will be pre-built with IDRS research, as well as a lead sheet or MACS data. Generally, the minimum IDRS that should
    be checked is:

    1. INOLES,

    2. INOLEX,

    3. BMFOLZ,

    4. BMFOLI,

    5. PMFOLS, and

    6. AMDISA.

    Additional research specific to an individual project also may be needed. This may include additional IDRS codes, Accurint,
    CBRS, etc. If the project cases have not been pre-built, the classifier is responsible for obtaining the necessary IDRS research.

  3. All employment tax projects and workstreams are designed to identify cases with high potential for audit. This identification
    is generally done via automation, including the sorting and filtering of data in a database. Classifiers should understand
    that in many instances, they are the first person to manually review the selected files. The classifiers’ primary function
    is to use their expertise to eliminate cases for reasons as explained below:

    1. Out of business: Review BMFOLI. If returns have recently posted or deposits recently made, this may indicate an ongoing business. The classifier
      also may check Internet resources such as Google for company website or sites such as Yellowpages.com for current phone listings.
      If information from the internet indicates the taxpayer is still in business, a print of the website information should be
      included in the file. If the taxpayer appears to be out of business, the case should be rejected.

    2. CID activity: A “Z”
      freeze on the account indicates CID is involved in the case and it should be rejected.

    3. Bankruptcy: A “V”
      freeze on the account indicates the taxpayer is in bankruptcy and the case should be rejected.

    4. Examination: An “L”
      freeze on the account indicates there may be an open audit. The classifier should check the status of the exam by securing
      a current AMDISA. If there is an income tax audit with status 06 or 08, the case can be selected. An income tax audit in status
      10 or 12 should be rejected.

    5. Collection: If the case is generated from a project designed to identify non-filers (i.e. CAWR) and the case is currently assigned to
      a Collection employee, the case should not be selected. If the case is in the queue but not assigned to a particular person,
      it may be selected.

  4. The most current version of the Employment Classification Checksheet must be completed for each case reviewed, whether or
    not selected for exam, and attached to the front of each file.

  5. The following subsections are examples of the types of work classified and selected by CWSD.

4.23.3.3.1 
(03-24-2009)
Combined Annual Wage Report (CAWR)

  1. The purpose of the IRS CAWR program is to ensure that employers paid the proper amount of taxes, withholding and advanced
    earned income credit. This is done by comparing the Forms W–3/W–2/W–3c/W–2c totals and the Form 1099–R and Form W–2G withholding
    amounts to the amounts reported on the employment tax returns.

  2. Case Types 1 and 9 (non-filers) are extracted and reviewed for audit potential.

  3. Employers filing Form W–2 but no Form 941 may be non-filers. Employers consistently out of balance between Form W–2 and Form
    941, coupled with other employment tax audit potential indicators, may have increased audit potential.

  4. See IRM 4.19.4, “CAWR Reconciliation Balancing,”
    for additional information on CAWR notices.

4.23.3.3.2 
(03-24-2009)
CP2100 Backup Withholding (BWH) “B”
Notice Report

  1. The BWH program provides “B”
    notices to payers who file information returns with incorrect Taxpayer Identification Numbers (TINs). The “B”
    notice (CP2100) advises payers that backup withholding could become necessary if payees fail to certify their TIN. The
    CP2100 Notice also lists accounts with missing TINs, on which the payer should have been backup withholding under IRC 3406(a)(1)(A).
    Payers with missing TIN accounts should not wait to receive a CP2100 to begin backup withholding. The BWH program includes
    Forms 1099-B, 1099–DIV, 1099–INT, 1099–MISC, 1099–OID, and 1099–PATR information returns.

  2. Payers with payees receiving Form 1099–MISC with missing or false TINs have the highest audit potential. Backup withholding
    should have been taken upon payment of qualifying amounts.

  3. See IRM 5.19.3, “Backup Withholding Program,”
    and IRM 20.1.7.1.6.3.3, “Special Notice Review CP 215/15,”
    for additional information on CP2100 notices.

4.23.3.3.3 
(03-24-2009)
Employer Tax Employee Project (ETEP)

  1. This project is an extract of employers issuing Forms 1099–MISC to workers. The examiner should refer to LEM 4.23.3 for selection
    criteria.

  2. A worker receiving only one Form 1099–MISC with no other income may be an employee and not an independent contractor. If the
    report indicates that the employer has other workers that are employees, this may indicate inconsistent treatment of workers
    performing the same job and indicate a worker classification issue.

4.23.3.3.4 
(03-24-2009)
SS-8 Worker Classification Follow-up

  1. Form SS-8, Determination of Worker Status for Purposes of Federal Employment Taxes and Income Tax Withholding, is the form
    used by a business or worker to request a determination or ruling letter regarding a workers federal employment tax status.

  2. Referrals from the SS-8 Unit are made to CWSD for classification and follow-up.

4.23.3.3.5 
(03-24-2009)
Classification Settlement Program (CSP) Follow-up

  1. The Classification Settlement Program (CSP) establishes procedures that will allow businesses and tax examiners to resolve
    worker classification cases as early in the administrative process as possible, thereby reducing taxpayer burden. The procedures
    will also ensure that the taxpayer relief provisions under section 530 of the Revenue Act of 1978 are properly applied. Under
    the CSP, Internal Revenue Service (IRS) examiners will be able to offer businesses under examination a worker classification
    settlement using a standard closing agreement.

  2. CSP Coordinators will identify taxpayers participating in CSP and Areas will establish systems for follow up. Since the CSP
    closing agreement includes a provision that the taxpayer complies prospectively, CFOL command codes will be researched to
    ensure that taxpayers are in compliance with the CSP closing agreements.

  3. Taxpayers not in compliance may have high worker classification audit potential. See IRM 4.23.6, “Classification Settlement
    Program, ”
    for additional information.

4.23.3.3.6 
(03-24-2009)
Mandatory Compliance Follow-Up Reviews on Voluntary Tip Agreements

  1. Securing the agreement is only the first step in increasing compliance for employers with employees who receive tip income.
    To ensure employers and their employees continue to report their tip income accurately, it is imperative that the Service
    monitor the compliance level of the program participants. A unit consisting of workload identification examiners will monitor
    the various tip agreements as defined in this section.

  2. Follow-up procedures for establishments participating in a:

    1. Tip Reporting Alternative Commitment (TRAC),

    2. Tip Rate Determination Agreement (TRDA),

    3. Gaming Industry Compliance Agreement (GITCA),

    4. Attributed Tip Income Program (ATIP), or

    5. Employer-designed Tip Reporting Alternative Commitment (EmTRAC).

    agreement will include a review of the employers Forms 941. If the tip program is working, an increase in the tip wages that
    are reported on Forms 941 should be evident.

  3. Under TRDA, GITCA and ATIP, tip rates are established for the various worker categories. These programs carry a threshold
    level of employee participation. Consistent with the terms of TRDA and ATIP agreements, at least seventy-five percent of the
    employees must sign an agreement and agree to report at or above the established tip rate for their job category.

  4. Generally, when an employer enters into a TRDA or GITCA, the employer agrees to review its tip rates, determine whether a
    tip rate increase/decrease is appropriate, and may submit proposed revisions to the Service by a date specified in its agreement.
    The Service Representative should follow up to verify whether any rate increases are required if the employer fails to contact
    the Service by the specified date.

  5. TRAC and EmTRAC do not require any tip rates to be established. However, employers do agree to educate new employees and re-educate
    continuing employees on a quarterly basis. TRAC also requires the employer to establish a reporting system and to file and
    pay taxes properly.

  6. Tip compliance agreements should be monitored at least annually. For TRAC, if the reporting of tip wages by tipped employees
    has not improved six months after securing the agreement, the employer should be notified. The Service should correspond with
    the employer to remind them of their tip reporting obligations and the consequences for failing to comply with the agreement
    commitments.

  7. Implementation of these follow-up procedures allows each employer to measure the effectiveness of their education program
    and determine whether the employees are complying with their tip reporting requirements. If noncompliance is identified, then
    examination referrals should be considered.

  8. Taxpayers under tip agreements with egregious noncompliance issues will be considered for audit.

4.23.3.3.7 
(03-24-2009)
Compliance Initiative Projects (CIP)

  1. Some lead driven projects require Compliance Initiative Project (CIP) procedures, involving groups of taxpayers that may be
    subject to audit as a result of the lead development activity.

  2. CIP procedures are not required in the case of “routine business operations,”
    as defined in IRM 4.17.1.3, “Activities Not Subject to CIP Procedures.”

  3. Other source workloads included in this section for which CIPs are not required are Collection referrals, Criminal Investigation
    referrals, TE/GE referrals, Information Reports, and Return Preparer Project.

  4. The criteria mentioned in IRM 4.1.4.3.8, “Compliance Initiative Projects (CIP),”
    must be used to determine when CIP procedures apply for Employment Tax projects.

4.23.3.3.8 
(03-24-2009)
Employment Tax Leads

  1. Group managers responsible for the employment tax program will receive all Specialist Referral System (SRS) referrals for
    their area of coverage. The group manager will ensure that the lead referrals are given appropriate consideration, consistent
    with available staffing and resources. Compliance efforts and follow-up actions will be determined in accordance with resource
    availability.

  2. CWSD will establish a consistent process for evaluating all other leads for examination potential and priority. To ensure
    there is consistency in lead evaluation, available internal information will be considered. Several Corporate Files On Line
    (CFOL) command codes should be utilized to determine lead potential and priority. These include the following:

    1. AMDIS — Lists current examination status. If an examination is in process in another group, forward the information to the
      group controlling the examination.

    2. BRTVU/RTVUE — Provides transcribed views of original BMF and IMF tax returns and schedules. These can frequently be used in
      place of an original return. However, original returns may be requested for inspection, when needed.

    3. PMFOL — Provides summary of Forms 1099/1096 data.

    4. BMFOL/IMFOL — Provides on-line research of nationwide entity and tax data information. When used with Definer Code “Z”
      , it shows prior audit history information. When used with Definer Code “U”
      , consolidated annual Forms 941 and W-2 information is displayed.

  3. In determining the priority of a lead, the following factors should be considered, including, but not limited to:

    1. the CFOL information described above,

    2. the size of the entity,

    3. the number of employees on payroll,

    4. the potential number of reclassified employees,

    5. the taxpayer’s current compliance level,

    6. the industry involved,

    7. materiality of potential adjustments, and

    8. the complexity of the issues.

  4. When it becomes necessary to make third party contacts to properly evaluate a referral, i.e., to seek clarification from an
    informant, the group manager will assign the case to an examiner. After third party contacts are made, the examiner will return
    the referral to the group manager to prioritize it based on the additional information derived from the third party contacts.

    Note:

    Managers and examiners must keep in mind that the provisions of IRC 7602(c) apply to third party contacts. Form 12175, Third
    Party Contact Report Form, should be completed when third party contacts are made. See IRM 4.10.1.6.12 for additional information.

  5. If it becomes apparent that a lead will not be assigned for examination because of its low priority or other business reasons,
    it will be closed (rejected).

  6. Exhibit 4.23.3–1, “Guidelines for Evaluation of Referrals,”
    contains further guidance for evaluation of referrals.

4.23.3.4 
(03-24-2009)
Planning and Selection Criteria for LMSB

  1. Selection of an employment tax return for examination within LMSB is primarily initiated from a referral generated by the
    start of a related income tax examination. The referral may be a result of a mandatory function or based on a specific or
    identified concern made by the agent or manager making the referral. Once the referral is made, it is the responsibility of
    the employment tax manager and agent to make an evaluation of the examination potential. The following information should
    be considered when evaluating the examination potential of the examination.

  2. During the pre-planning phase, the employment tax specialist should perform a study of available information. A pre-examination
    analysis should include consideration of related tax and information returns. The examiner should utilize CFOL (Corporate
    Files On-Line), which includes:

    1. BMFOL,

    2. BRTVU,

    3. IMFOL,

    4. INOLE,

    5. IRPTR, and

    6. PMFOL.

    to obtain information to determine whether employment and information returns have been timely filed. A review of the financial
    statements, disclosure statements, and current news articles involving the taxpayer should be reviewed in order to properly
    identify examination potential. Internet searches of the taxpayer’s website and SEC filings of publicly traded companies can
    provide information about wages and benefits.

  3. All income tax cases selected for examination under the LMSB Program should include consideration of employment tax potential.
    Referrals are mandatory on all coordinated industry cases (CIC) and on all industry cases (IC) at activity code 223 and above.
    Where employment tax issues or returns are identified as warranting examination, an employment tax specialist will prepare
    the employment tax portion of the examination plan.

4.23.3.5 
(03-24-2009)
Compliance Assurance Process (CAP)

  1. The IRS announced the Compliance Assurance Process (CAP) pilot program in Announcement 2005-87, IRB 2005-50, 1144, for use
    in LMSB examinations. The CAP pilot was designed to evaluate a process for achieving tax compliance through pre-filing review
    and resolution of issues. During the pre-filing stage of CAP, the IRS works with taxpayers using a variety of sources to identify
    and resolve issues of controversy in ” real time.”
    This solution establishes tax law compliance more quickly and efficiently while maintaining customer service and process
    integrity.

  2. The review is an integral component of the CAP process. The employment tax agent is responsible for identifying and resolving
    compliance concerns and employment tax issues during this “real time”
    process. At the conclusion of the pre-filing stage of CAP, the employment tax agent is required to make a recommendation
    to the income tax team addressing issues identified, raised and resolved during this examination period. For a complete description
    of CAP processes and the role of the field specialist, refer to the CAP website at:

    http://lmsb.irs.gov/CAP/

4.23.3.6 
(03-24-2009)
Initial Contact With Taxpayers

  1. A telephone call or letter will be used in all instances to schedule an appointment in the field for an employment tax interview
    or compliance check.

  2. The taxpayer should be provided Publication 1, Your Rights as a Taxpayer, and Notice 609, Privacy Act Notice, at the initial
    appointment contact, either as enclosures to the appointment letter or at the first interview. If the examination is to address
    worker reclassification issues, Publication 1976, Independent Contractor or Employee?, should also be furnished. See IRM 4.10.2.7.4.1
    and IRM 4.10.2.7.4.2.

  3. The initial interview is an important part of the examination and/or compliance process.

    1. The first few minutes should be spent explaining the process and the taxpayer’s rights. The taxpayer’s receipt of Publication
      1, Your Rights as a Taxpayer, will be confirmed and specifically noted in the workpapers. Publication 1 fulfills the requirement
      in IRC 7521(b) that taxpayers be informed of the process and their rights under such process at or before the initial interview.

    2. If the taxpayer has not received Publication 1, furnish the publication before proceeding with the initial interview.

    3. Several other provisions in IRC 7521, Procedures involving taxpayer interviews, affect taxpayer interviews. See IRM 4.23.3.7.5,
      “Taxpayer Rights, ”
      below.

  4. If the examiner is able to determine the taxpayer is in compliance or is able to bring the taxpayer into compliance at the
    initial interview without reviewing the books or records or asking common law questions, the examiner may recommend that no
    examination be conducted. Examiners should follow delinquent return procedures as described in IRM 4.23.12, “Delinquent Return
    Procedures,”
    if applicable.

  5. Do not settle tax due, or agree not to examine a taxpayer where noncompliance is known, in exchange for prospective compliance.
    Where settlement of tax appears to be advantageous to Service objectives, the Area Office of Chief Counsel should be contacted
    for assistance. On LMSB coordinated industry cases, the attorney assigned to the case should be contacted for advice. In situations
    where execution of a closing agreement is warranted to resolve an issue, Counsel will assist in providing the appropriate
    language.

4.23.3.7 
(03-24-2009)
Employment Tax Examination Procedures

  1. The following procedures are provided to assist examiners in the examination of employment tax returns.

4.23.3.7.1 
(03-24-2009)
Required Filing Checks — Employment Taxes

  1. The group manager should be alert to possible employment tax issues in assigning non-employment tax cases and should, when
    appropriate, call this to the attention of the examiner for consideration under the required filing checks procedures. See
    IRM 4.10, Examination of Returns.

  2. The related employment tax returns are not usually associated with the income tax returns or tax-exempt returns classified
    for examination. Examination of the related returns will ordinarily be made from the taxpayer’s retained copies of such returns
    or a BRTVU. If an employment tax examination is warranted and the examiner needs, but cannot secure, copies of the returns,
    the examiner will requisition the originals of those returns for association with the case file.

  3. Collection employees share full compliance check responsibilities. When making a field visit, the revenue officer should determine
    whether all required employment tax returns were filed and paid. If the revenue officer encounters a situation where it appears
    that the firm is treating employees as independent contractors or where there are questionable fringe benefits, they will
    make a referral to the territory Employment Tax Group Manager, or to the PSP Support Manager, if no employment tax group manager
    is located in the territory. Refer to the Collection Handbook for further guidance.

4.23.3.7.2 
(03-24-2009)
Referrals to the Tax Exempt and Government Entities Division

  1. The relief provisions under Section 530 apply only to federal employment taxes, therefore the worker should be treated as
    an employee for all other purposes. If an examiner encounters an employer entitled to the relief provisions of Section 530,
    there is potential that an Employee Plans issue exists and a referral determination should be considered. Exhibit 4.23.3–2
    contains an employee plans referral checksheet.

  2. If a referral to TE/GE – Employee Plans is required as a result of a compliance check or an examination, the examiner will
    report the findings on Form 3449, Referral Report, and mail to:

    IRS – EP Classification
    McCaslin Industrial Park
    2 Cupania Circle
    Monterey Park, CA 91755–7631

4.23.3.7.3 
(03-24-2009)
Scope of Employment Tax Examination

  1. It is recognized that examinations, whether change or no-change, vary in scope. Normally, the examiner is expected:

    1. To conduct the examination to a point where the reported employment tax liability is determined to be substantially correct,

    2. To determine whether information returns and wage statements have been correctly filed, and

    3. To determine whether all applicable Federal returns requirements have been met.

  2. In some cases, the examination will be extensive to properly determine the taxpayer’s employment tax liability and information
    return compliance. In other cases, examiners will be able to complete the examination after inquiry into only a few items
    because, in their judgment, to proceed any further with the examination would result in no material change in tax liability.

  3. In examinations, Employment Tax Specialists should control all 4 quarters of Form 941 when an examination covers the entire
    year. This applies even if the case results in a no-change, as it will more accurately reflect the audit work conducted. In
    some cases, the examiner may determine that it is appropriate to control less than all four quarters of a year. Examples include
    claims filed for a certain period or bonuses paid in a certain quarter. Managerial approval should be secured if the examination
    is to be for less than four quarters. Also see IRM 4.23.10.12.4, “Employment Tax No-Change Report.”

  4. LMSB examiners are required to open all four quarters of Form 941 in a calendar year when an examination covers the entire
    year – this applies even if the case results in a no-change. This will more accurately reflect the audit work conducted. Three
    to four months prior to the case closing, the examiner should ensure they control all applicable periods. Additionally, any
    subsidiary and related employment tax returns should be established if taxpayer records relating to wage payments have been
    requested from these entities.

  5. The examination report will not include any calendar quarters for the current year, unless the taxpayer is no longer in business.
    Inform the taxpayer to correct any errors for these quarters in accordance with IRC 6205 and the Administrative and Procedural
    Regulations there under. For example, if the examination was concluded on November 1, 2008, prepare an examination report
    for 2006 and 2007 and advise the taxpayer, assuming the same issue existed for 2008, to correct the error for the first three
    quarters of 2008 in accordance with IRC 6205. This procedure is consistent with Policy Statements 4-4 and 5-133.

  6. Generally, an employment tax examination should not be started for a calendar year until after the last filing date for all
    employment tax returns of that year. Normally, this is January 31 following the end of the calendar year. If the employment
    tax is to be computed under IRC 3509, it will be necessary to wait until after the filing date for information returns in
    order to determine the applicable employment tax rate. These returns are due the last day of February following the end of
    the calendar year.

  7. Copies of the prior and subsequent year returns will be inspected. Expand the audit to include open periods where the issue
    is recurring or where there appears to be other large, unusual or questionable items.

  8. Document any factors used to limit the scope of the examination and the managerial approval of such action.

4.23.3.7.4 
(03-24-2009)
Scheduling the Appointment

  1. In arranging for a convenient time and place to start an examination, it is advisable to telephone the taxpayer or the representative.
    If the initial appointment is scheduled by telephone, mail an appointment letter to confirm the appointment and summarize
    the list of records to be made available during the examination.

  2. At all times endeavor to make appointments at a time and place that will meet the convenience of the taxpayer and be consistent
    with Federal Administrative and Procedural Regulations § 301.7605–1 on time and place of examination. Field examinations will
    normally be conducted at the taxpayer’s place of business. Enter a taxpayer’s private premises only when invited in by the
    rightful occupant. If fraud is a feature or if the interests of the Government may be jeopardized, the convenience of the
    taxpayer need not be regarded as paramount.

  3. Examinations should be conducted at the place where the taxpayer maintains the business operations. However, the examination
    may be conducted at a place other than the location of the business operation if agreed to by the examiner and the taxpayer
    or the authorized representative. Once the appointment is made, try to avoid cancelling it.

  4. If the case file indicates that a power of attorney is on file or if a taxpayer or duly authorized representative requests,
    orally or in writing, that Service notification be made through the representative, the examiner will determine if there is
    a valid power of attorney on file with the Service and if any restrictions are contained therein.

  5. Publication 1, Your Rights as a Taxpayer, and Notice 609, Privacy Act Notice, must be included with all initial contact letters.
    If it has not been mailed to the taxpayer in advance of the interview, it will be provided at the initial meeting. Workpapers
    should be documented to confirm that Publication 1 was provided to the taxpayer.

  6. Examiners are not authorized to assure taxpayers that their books and records will be used solely for civil purposes. (See
    the Criminal Investigations Handbook). If a taxpayer insists upon such assurances or gives the examiner a statement that the
    books and records are only being made available for limited purposes, the examiner shall find out the taxpayer’s reasons for
    refusing to furnish the records without restriction and then discontinue the examination and report this information to the
    group manager. The group manager and the examiner should then discuss the matter with the Criminal Investigation function.
    That office will study any available information on the taxpayer and will advise on further steps to be taken. It may decide
    that in view of all known factors, including the taxpayer’s refusal to furnish records unconditionally, that there is a possible
    indication that fraud exists. When appropriate, a referral to Criminal Investigation function will be made in accordance with
    procedures in IRM 4.23.9.6.5, “Referrals to the Criminal Investigation Division.”
    Advice should be sought from Area Counsel when necessary.

4.23.3.7.5 
(03-24-2009)
Taxpayer Rights

  1. IRC 7521, Procedures Involving Taxpayer Interviews, was enacted by the Technical and Miscellaneous Revenue Act of 1988 (TAMRA)
    as part of the Omnibus Taxpayer Bill of Rights. Under the Taxpayer Bill of Rights, the taxpayer has a right to:

    1. Receive, in non-technical language, an explanation of the many rights available at each step of the tax process. This explanation
      must be furnished before an initial interview. Publication 1, Your Rights as a Taxpayer, was developed to meet this requirement.
      Routine telephone calls initiated by the taxpayer or the Service are not considered initial interviews. Publication 1 explains
      the procedures covering examination of tax returns and appeal rights and should be furnished to all taxpayers.
      1. At the beginning of an examination, ask taxpayers whether they have any questions regarding the audit process, regular
      selection procedures and appeal rights.
      2. If the taxpayer does have questions, give a clear and concise explanation.
      3. Advise the taxpayers that there is no 90-Day Deficiency Notice and employment tax cases are not normally heard in the U.S.
      Tax Court, but they are heard in District Court. The Tax Relief Act of 1997 specifies that cases involving employee classification
      and Section 530 relief are under the jurisdiction of the Tax Court.

    2. Consult with a representative who is currently authorized to represent taxpayers under rules provided in Treasury Department
      Circular 230, Regulations Governing the Practice of Attorneys, Certified Public Accountants, Enrolled Agents, Enrolled Actuaries,
      Enrolled Retirement Plan Agents and Appraisers before the Internal Revenue Service. If taxpayers clearly state, during an
      interview, that they wish to consult with a representative, the interview must be suspended. In cases where this process is
      abused (i.e., repeated suspension of interviews to contact a representative) an administrative summons may be issued. A taxpayer
      cannot be required to accompany an authorized representative to an examination interview in the absence of an administrative
      summons. However, the taxpayer’s voluntary presence at the interview can be requested through the representative as a means
      to expedite the process.

    3. Upon prior notice to the Service, the taxpayer may make an audio recording of an in-person interview. Upon prior notice to
      the taxpayer, the Service is entitled to make a recording or transcript of an interview provided the taxpayer receives a copy
      upon request and pays the cost of reproduction.

  2. The Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) is an independent organization within the IRS whose employees assist taxpayers who are
    experiencing economic harm, who are seeking help in resolving tax problems that have not been resolved through normal procedures,
    or who believe that an IRS system or procedure is not working as it should. Refer to IRM 13.1.7, “Taxpayer Advocate Case Procedures
    – Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) Case Criteria, ”
    for pertinent information and TAS criteria. Publication 1546, The Taxpayer Advocate Service, provides contact and additional
    information. The program is designed to alleviate taxpayer hardships that arise from systemic problems or the application
    of the Internal Revenue Code. All inquiries meeting TAS criteria should be documented on Form 911, Application for Taxpayer
    Assistance Order (ATAO), or Form e-911, and forwarded to the Advocates office by the most expeditious method available. Also
    see Delegation Order 13-1, (formerly D. O. 232, rev. 4) in IRM 1.2.50, “Delegation of Authorities for Taxpayer Advocate Service
    Activities. ”

4.23.3.7.6 
(03-24-2009)
Third Party Authorization/Power of Attorney

  1. Accountants, attorneys, enrolled agents or other representatives, from whom a taxpayer has requested assistance on tax problems,
    may submit inquiries to the Internal Revenue Service. The third party expects a reply to the inquiries so the problem can
    be explained to the taxpayer. To authorize this third party reply, the representative may submit a Form 2848, Power of Attorney
    and Declaration of Representative, (POA), or Form 8821, Tax Information Authorization (TIA).

  2. The Form 2848 and Form 8821 should contain the following information:

    1. Taxpayer(s) full name(s), address, EIN or SSN, and telephone number,

    2. Representative(s) full name(s), CAF (Centralized Authorization File) number(s) (if one has already been assigned), address
      (the box under New Address should be checked if address changed since being assigned a CAF number) and telephone number,

    3. Type of tax (must be specific); if it is specifically for Form SS–8, it must indicate the form specifically,

    4. Tax year(s) or period(s) (if form indicates “for all years ”
      or “for all periods”
      , insert the earliest year or period under examination as the beginning year or period),

    5. Name and address where correspondence and/or notices are to be sent (optional),

    6. The taxpayer’s signature and date of signature, and

    7. If the POA is granted to an attorney, CPA, or enrolled agent, a declaration of good standing before the IRS must be signed
      by the representative. (This does not apply to the Form 8821).

  3. If the POA/TIA is not attached to any return or document, either the original or a copy of the form should be promptly forwarded
    to one of the three centralized CAF Units at the Campuses. See IRM 21.3.7.1.6 to determine where to send the POA/TIA. The
    original or a copy of the POA/TIA should also be retained with the case file.

    Note:

    Original documents, photocopies, or documents submitted by facsimile transmission (FAX) are acceptable for processing.

  4. Forwarding the POA/TIA to the Campus will trigger required actions to ensure input of a POA code to the entity on the appropriate
    master file or non-master file and will result in subsequent mailings of copies of computer communications to the authorized
    representative. POAs/TIAs are maintained on an automated system know as the Centralized Authorization File (CAF).

  5. POAs/TIAs filed for specific issues are not to be detached from the related document and sent to the Campus unless the document
    authorizes recognition for a return in addition to the specific issue. In this case, a copy of the POA/TIA should be sent
    to the CAF unit at the Campus to input the return portion on the CAF system. Examples of specific issues include, but are
    not limited to, the following:

    • Form 843, Claim for Refund and Request for Abatement,

    • Form 966, Corporate Dissolution or Liquidation,

    • Form W–4, Employee’s Withholding Allowance Certificate,

    • Form 4361, Application for Exemption from Self-Employment Tax for Use by Ministers, Members of Religious Orders and Christian
      Science Practitioners,

    • Form SS–4, Application for Employer Identification Number, and

    • General Power of Attorney or Durable Power of Attorney. These powers of attorney usually do not contain sufficient information
      to process on CAF. If a general or durable power of attorney is submitted, attach a completed Form 2848 (POA), and send both forms to the CAF function for processing.

  6. Occasionally, the POA of record states he or she is no longer representing the taxpayer, or the taxpayer indicates they wish
    to cancel the existing POA. In such instances, it is important that the CAF be corrected to delete the existing POA. Cancellation
    of an existing POA can be effected by securing a statement to that effect signed by the existing POA or the taxpayer. Such
    signed statements will be sent to the CAF unit in the Campus.

  7. The Form 8821 does not authorize a representative to sign documents on behalf of the taxpayer or represent the taxpayer before
    Appeals.

4.23.3.7.6.1 
(03-24-2009)
Bypassing a Taxpayer’s Representative

  1. There may be occasions when it becomes necessary to bypass the taxpayer’s representative. IRM 4.11.55.3, “By-Pass of a Representative,

    provides detailed examination information on bypass procedures.

4.23.3.7.7 
(03-24-2009)
Trustee in Bankruptcy Acting as Employer

  1. In accordance with IRC 3401(d)(1) and the holding of the Supreme Court in Otte v. U.S., 419 U.S. 43 (1974), 1975-1 C.B. 329, a trustee in bankruptcy is an employer for purposes of income tax withholding and withholding
    the employee’s share of FICA. This is because the trustee in bankruptcy has control of the payment of wages. The payor is
    obligated to prepare and file Form 941 and to prepare, file, and distribute the related Form W–2 for each wage claimant. Furthermore,
    Otte has been extended to provide that the person having control of the payment is also an employer for purposes of the employer’s
    share of FICA and FUTA. See Lane Processing Trust v. United States, 25 F.3d 662 (8th Cir. 1994), and re Armadillo Corp., 410 F. Supp. 407 (D. Col. 1976), aff’d, 561 F.2d 1382 (10th Cir. 1977). Withholding and employment taxes incurred by the bankruptcy estate are entitled to be paid
    as administrative expenses under BC 503(b)(1)(B).

  2. The Otte doctrine may be applied in cases involving payers other than bankruptcy trustees.

4.23.3.7.8 
(03-24-2009)
Examination Request Master File, Form 5345-D

  1. As soon as it is determined that an examination will be conducted, the examiner will complete Form 5345-D, Examination Request-ERCS
    (Examination Returns Control System) Users. A maximum of five tax periods for the same taxpayer may be requested on each Form
    5345-D. TE/GE examiners may continue to use Form 5597, TE/GE IMF/BMF/EPMF Request. (Areas with automated inventory controls
    systems, such as RGS and ERCS, should follow locally established procedures for requesting or updating controls.)

  2. Examinations of LMSB coordinated industry cases (CIC) must be annotated on Form 5345-D by placing a “P”
    in the field that asks if this is an LMSB/CIC case. Project Codes will be determined by the main issue on the case and
    the appropriate tracking code will be chosen from the most current listing available.

  3. After obtaining group manager approval, forward the Form 5345-D for terminal input. Retain a copy of each Form 5345-D in the
    case file.

4.23.3.7.9 
(03-24-2009)
Examination Update, Form 5348, AIMS/ERCS Update

  1. Form 5348, AIMS/ERCS Update, (or Form 5595, TE/GE Update) is used with examination audit labels to:

    • re-establish closed returns,

    • update status code,

    • update organization code,

    • update statute date,

    • update project code,

    • generate a follow-up request for a missing return,

    • request additional audit or address labels, and

    • update amount of claim.

  2. Instructions on the use of Form 5348 can be found in IRM 4.4.34.3, “Items that can be Updated/Corrected and Form to Use.”

4.23.3.7.10 
(03-24-2009)
Request For Terminal Action, Form 4844

  1. Form 4844, Request for Terminal Action, will be completed where the results of a compliance check or examination reveal that
    the taxpayer has filing requirements that are not currently on IDRS. Document 6209, IRS Processing Codes and Information,
    lists the correct codes for BMF Filing Requirements.

4.23.3.7.11 
(03-24-2009)
Time Reporting

  1. Accurate time and activity reporting is essential to effective planning, budgeting, and evaluating the Employment Tax Program.
    Currently, each division has separate reporting procedures.

  2. For those employees working mixed inventories, time, as it relates to the specific tasks, will be charged to the appropriate
    codes. Activity codes can be found in Chapter 12 of Document 6209. See IRM Handbook 4.9.1, Examination Technical Time Reporting
    System and Procedures, Outline of System, Exhibits 4.9.1-1, 4.9.1-2, and 4.9.1-3 for complete explanations.

Exhibit 4.23.3-1 
(03-24-2009)
Guidelines for Evaluation of Referrals

(1) Information from the income tax return can reveal wages that have been misclassified in a number of areas:

 a. Compensation of corporate officers can be shown as “0″
but a review of the Form 1120 may reveal that the officers have taken draws, dividends, professional fees, administrative
fees, etc., to avoid taxable wages.

 b. Compensation of corporate officers can be shown as “0″
but a review of the Form 1120 may reveal that the officers have spent 100% of their time in the operation of the business.

 c. Schedules for “other deductions”
often disclose bonuses to officers and employees. Payments to consultants are often listed on these schedules.

 d. The reconciliation of accounts often shows loans and advances to corporate officers which may be salary in disguise.

 e. Cost of goods sold often reveals labor and wage costs which may not appear on Forms W–2/1099/ 941.

 f. A service organization reporting cost of labor in cost of goods sold is suspect.

 g. Schedule C, Form 1040, often shows cost of labor and/or commissions in the cost of goods sold – but no Forms 941 have
been filed.

(2) Reconciliation of the Forms 941/940/W–2 and the income tax return often highlights a discrepancy.

(3) Taxpayers may file Form 940 but no Forms 941. Tying this information into the tax return may show a discrepancy.

(4) Reconcile labor deducted on the income tax return less the FICA wages and total of amounts reported on Forms 1099 issued.
Any discrepancy may mean an excessive deduction for wages and an adjustment. If the accrual method of accounting is used,
an adjustment to the FICA wages reported will have to be made to make the income tax return information comparable to the
Forms 941 and 1099.

(5) Large changes in the gross profit percentage [(SaIes - Cost of Good Sold) divided by Sales)] from one year to another
may indicate hidden labor costs.

(6) The Payor Master File General Transcript (CC PMFOL) provides the following information:

 a. No Record of filing or filing late can eliminate the safe haven provided by Section 530 if this becomes an issue.

 b. The summary of transcript contains information concerning the number of Forms 1099 filed and the dollar amount of these
forms. This figure can be compared to the miscellaneous wage figures reported on the tax return for possible underreporting.

(7) Researching the particular industry of the workers will indicate the pros and cons of issues presented in previous rulings
– or indicate a category on which to base an evaluation. The research will provide a basis for evaluating the likelihood of
successfully challenging an issue.

(8) Interviews of third party contacts (particularly the individual supplying the lead information) can provide additional
information to ensure the correct entity has been identified, provide the number and types of workers, the possible amount
of wages misclassified, and other information which will assist the evaluator in assigning a priority to the lead. However,
before contacting third parties, ensure that the provisions of IRC 7602, Examination of Books and Witnesses, are followed.

(9) If no internal information can be obtained, the initial lead evaluation process is restricted to the information contained
on the lead, interviews of third parties, general industry research, and past experience in the industry. If the lead warrants
additional consideration after the above steps have been taken, the lead may, at the managers discretion, be assigned to
an examiner for personal contact with the taxpayer.

Exhibit 4.23.3-2 
(03-24-2009)
Employee Plans (EP) Referral Checksheet

1. Were any non-employees reclassified as employees? Y N
 If yes, please attach a list of those employees.

2. Were any plan participants’ compensation adjusted? Y N
 If yes, please attach a list of the participants, their compensation, and the adjustment amount.

3. Does the employer offer plan participation of individuals other than common law employees or self-employed individuals
treated as employees pursuant to IRC section 401(c)(1)?
 Y N

4. Are there any employees who are covered by the Section 530 safe haven who have been excluded from participation in the
plan? Y N
 If yes, please attach a list of the names of those employees.

INSTRUCTIONS: Any yes answer warrants a referral to TE/GE —Employee Plans (EP).

Law Offices of Darrin T. Mish, PA

100 S. Edison Ave. Suite A, PO Box 3414, Tampa, FL 33606 (813) 229-7100
Made with Semiologic Pro • Colorblock-blue skin by Techie Coach